Skip to main content

RFQdecoder

Home » vs should-cost software

Comparison · software

Part costing software: which one for what?

Short answer: they all rebuild cost from the process: material, time, rates, overheads. They differ in what you upload (native CAD, STEP, drawing), in data depth (digital factories, country rate libraries) and in access model, from enterprise licences on demo to the monthly subscription published by simus systems.

By the RFQdecoder team · updated 27 September 2026

Five tools side by side

ToolWhat you uploadWhat you getAccessWho it is for
aPriori3D CAD modelCost, manufacturability and carbon, by simulating digital factoriesOn demoDesign, manufacturing engineering, sourcing, quoting
TsetPart or supplier quote, manufacturing parametersFull cost structure and CO2, compared with the quoteCloud, on demoProcurement and cost engineering, OEMs and Tier 1s
DFM Concurrent CostingProcess, material, geometry, even without a detailed drawingShould-cost and cycle time, 25+ processesOn requestSourcing, design, manufacturing engineering
costing24SolidWorks, Inventor, NX, CATIA V5, Creo, STEP and moreCosts and times per machine: turning, milling, sheet metal, drilling€200 per month for 200 calculations, 10-day trialSales engineers, designers, planning, purchasing
RFQdecoderPDF, DXF or STEP drawingManufacturing routing and cost of each step, editableFree, no account; API for volumeBuyers, design offices, SMEs

Sources: aPriori, Tset, Boothroyd Dewhurst, simus systems, pages checked on 27 September 2026.

What really sets them apart

  • Input: a native CAD model gives more geometric detail; a PDF drawing is enough when all you have is the supplier’s quote and drawing.
  • Data: Boothroyd Dewhurst offers rates for 22+ countries and can cost the same part across 37 manufacturing regions.
  • Scope: costing24 covers machining, sheet metal and drilling; aPriori and Tset also target assembly, logistics and carbon.
  • Deployment: an enterprise licence means a project; an online tool can be tried on one part in a few minutes.

How to choose

  • Costing hundreds of part numbers with a cost engineering team: an enterprise platform.
  • Pricing your own quotes in turning, milling or sheet metal: a subscription such as costing24.
  • Analysing a quote you received or testing a design: an online tool working from the drawing.
  • Costing from an ERP or an AI assistant: an API returning the same breakdown.

Sources

  • aPriori, “CAD to Cost Manufacturing”, 29 July 2026.
  • Tset, “Should Cost Analysis Software for Supplier Negotiations”, accessed 27 September 2026.
  • Boothroyd Dewhurst, “Sourcing & Cost Management, DFM Concurrent Costing”, accessed 27 September 2026.
  • simus systems, “costing24: Online-Kalkulation, die sich rechnet”, accessed 27 September 2026.

Frequently asked questions

A tool that rebuilds the cost of a part from its manufacturing process: material, time per operation, hourly rates and overheads, to prepare a quote or analyse a supplier quote.

costing24 publishes a subscription of €200 per month for 200 calculations, with a 10-day free trial. aPriori and Tset give access on demo. RFQdecoder is free, with no account, for costing from a drawing.

costing24 reads native SolidWorks, Solid Edge, Inventor, NX, CATIA V5 and Creo files, plus STEP and JT. RFQdecoder accepts PDF, DXF and STEP.

Yes. Boothroyd Dewhurst states it can cost the same part across 37 manufacturing regions, with rates for 22+ countries.

For an occasional quote analysis or design check, an online tool working from the drawing; for pricing your own machining or sheet metal quotes, a monthly subscription.

Try it on one of your parts

Upload a PDF, DXF or STEP drawing: the routing and the cost of each step, no account, in a few minutes.